Cruise Planning Questionnaire
Ship: | ATLANTIS | ![]() |
| ![]() | |
| ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
| D. Fornari and J. Cochran | ![]() |
| WHOI and LDEO | ![]() |
| WHOI, G&G Dept. MS#24 Woods Hole, MA 02543 Lamont-Doherty Earth Obs. Rt. 9W Palisades, NY 10964 | ![]() |
| 508-289-2857 914-365-8396 | ![]() |
| dfornari@whoi.edu, jrc@ldeo.columbia.edu | ![]() |
| ![]() | |
![]() | ![]() | |
Departure port & date: | 27 Jan 2000 | ![]() |
| ![]() | |
| ![]() | |
| ![]() | |
| 5 Alvin Dives | ![]() |
Arrival port & date: | 9 Feb. 2000 | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Op area: | EPR crest 9°35-38'N | ![]() |
Lat/Lon: | 9° 35'-38'N 104° 15'-16'W | ![]() |
Depth range: | 2500-3000 m | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | |
| ||
| ![]() | |
|
| |
| |
| Specify: |
| The primary purpose of the 5 Alvin dives to the EPR crest will be to conduct near-bottom geophysical traverses across the ridge axis along E-W lines that are spaced about 100m apart, using the NAVO Bell BGM-3 gravimeter in the Alvin sphere. The field area is the site of a small overlapping spreading center where we believe that we have the best chance of imaging the distribution and continuity of individual dike swarms that underlie the axial summit trough in this region. This could provide a very new and important understanding of the volcanic emplacement and eruption processes at the mid-ocean ridge. The gravimeter installation in Alvin has been carried out a few times in the past and the various requirements for electrical and data inputs/outputs are basically familiar to the at-sea ops group and the shore based DSG. The meter has been sniff tested. Navigation is essential to the data acquisition and analysis program. Dana Yoerger has agreed to assist with the integration of a DSL doppler on Alvin to help refine the LBL navigation. The basic plan for LBL will be to deploy approximately 6 transponders, in a network that covers an area spanning about 3 minutes of latitude from 9 35 N to 9 38 N. We tentative plan to deploy the transponders in a line west of the ridge axis, but are open to alternate plans. Details of the dive plan and the navigation scheme will be discussed at a meeting with Dana and DSG with a Seabeam map of the area. In addition to the primary acquisition of near-bottom gravity data, we need to have better point to point pressure depth data recorded at 1 sec intervals (the same acquisition rate for the gravity data), and 1 sec data from the suite of Alvin attitude sensors. It is critical that the gravity data be recorded and time stamped with the same time as all the attitude data. In 1994, we attempted this but there was a fundamental problem with an emulator program used on the Alvin datalogging computer to record the gravity data that was not synched to the Alvin time base. We will need to be sure that we have fully discussed and resolved these issues well prior to the cruise so that none of the past problems recur as they very negatively impact the processing and interpretation of the geophysical data. One other critical aspect of the program is the sub s trim and autopilot controls during the traverses. We plan to travel over the seafloor at about 5 to 7 m altitude, and try to maintain a constant altitude over the bottom with as few vertical excursions as possible as they dramatically impact the accelerations recorded in the gravity data. We will generally not be stopping for samples during the dives, other than perhaps at the start and end, when we will sit on the bottom to stabilize the meter as pre- and post- traverse checks on data quality. So the dives will entail a lot of driving with the requirement that the pilot try to maintain the sub s track and altitude accurately in order to run the prescribed survey lines. In addition, we may do one control line where we put markers on the bottom and sit and acquire gravity for 5 minutes at each site, and then fly over the same locations collecting data. This has been done to excellent effect previously (Cochran et al., 1999) in our 1994 experiment and serves to provide a quantitative control on data precision and accuracy. Is there any way to better control Alvin s path through the water to minimize the porpoising we ve seen in the past? I suspect that perhaps the trim and ballasting of the sub is critical in this respect. Please let us know about this. |
| ||
| ||
| Refrigerator | |
| Chest Freezer | |
| -70 Deg Freezer | |
| ||
| ||
| Pinger for Wire Use |
| |
|
![]() | Science Van #1 | Science Van #2 | Science Van #3 |
| |||
| |||
| |||
|
![]() | Instruments(s) | Instrument Weight(s) | Maximum Depth |
| |||
| rock corer | 3000m | |
| WHOI towed camera | 3000m | |
|
| No | Number of conductors: | ||
| No | If so, what type? | ||
| No | ![]() | ![]() |
| Yes | |
| No | |
| No | |
| No |
| No | ![]() | |
| No | ![]() | |
| No | ![]() | |
| No | ![]() | |
| No | ![]() |
Vehicle equipment required: | Check one or both: |
Major water samplers | ![]() | ![]() | |
Large capacity slurp samplers | |||
Small capacity slurp samplers | ![]() | ![]() | |
Bio collection boxes | |||
Push corers | ![]() | ![]() | |
Scoop nets | ![]() | ![]() | |
High temperature probe | ![]() | ![]() | |
Low temperature probe | ![]() | ![]() | |
Heat flow probe | ![]() | ![]() | |
Magnetometer | ![]() | ![]() | |
Portable CTD | ![]() | ![]() | |
Digital Still Camera | |||
Search Sonar | ![]() | ![]() | |
Profiling Sonar | |||
Rock Drill (Jason only) | ![]() | ![]() | |
Video Duplication (Jason) | ![]() | ![]() | |
Elevators | ![]() | ![]() |
| |
![]() | ![]() |
| see above listing |
![]() | ![]() |
| Bell Gravimeter (already sniff tested) digital still and video cameras laptop computer (already sniff tested) |
![]() | ![]() |
| ![]() |